Why I Left the Full Frame Camp Pt. II

...and eventually came back

A while ago, I wrote that I left full-frame for µ4/3. I started to feel like the bulk of a full-frame DSLR was prohibitive. What's the point of a fancy camera if you're less inclined to take it anywhere. Their output is generally second to none but even a cellphone picture is better than no picture if you're not willing to lug around 3+ lbs (1440g). To some degree that's still true.

So, yeah. I half-dumped µ4/3 and jumped on the full-frame bandwagon again. Not necessarily for image quality concerns. I wanted a larger sensor for equivalency. Before you start in on me about the equivalency issue, hear me out.

I've been an Olympus fan for quite some time. I have a couple SLR bodies, several lenses ranging from 21mm to 100mm (210mm if you count the old Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm 1:3.5) plus two nifty rangefinders (35 RD & 35 SPn). When I had the Canon 6D, focusing with an optical view finder, while not impossible, was less than ideal even after swapping out the stock focus screen the "precision" Eg-s focus screen. The Olympus OM-D, with its electronic view finder, changed that. The ability to use focus aids made focusing a breeze. Olympus lenses aren't the best in absolute performance terms, but some of them do quite well on digital bodies.

AsymetricalOlympus OM-D E-M1 + Olympus OM Zuiko MC 50mm 1:3.5 Macro - 1/100s @ f/8 ISO 200

This was amazing! I could get really sharp results from my old lenses easier than I could with with the Canon. But there was always something that bothered me: I had a good 24mm f/2.8 but on the µ4/3 camera that turned into a 48mm field of view with a not-so-narrow depth of field. I like my wide angle primes. I didn't have that with my old OM mount lenses on the smaller sensor of the µ4/3. Having started my obsession with photography using standard 135 film, crop sensors have always bugged me. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to negate the µ4/3 system; it is a really good system with few flaws. One can make really good images from even smaller sensors; just like one can make really bad images from larger sensors.

While the sensor in the Sony A7 series camera is pretty amazing and performs a little better under certain conditions, it's not the main reason I chose to part ways with the Olympus. No. That was pure internal conflict with my old self telling me, "...but the lens is a 50mm lens! It should have a 50mm field of view!"

So, here I am. Still have an OM-D E-M10 that I use fairly regularly. But I also have a Sony A7II. I like them both for different reasons.

Portland SunsetSony A7II + Olympus OM G.Zuiko 21mm 1:3.5 - 1/1000s @ f/8 ISO 100

Portland ParadeSony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko 24mm 1:2.8 - 1/640s @ f/8 ISO 200

Rhody Garden 1Sony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko 24mm 1:2.8 - 1/125s @ f/8 ISO 100

Little GirlSony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko MC 100mm 1:2.8 - 1/1250s @ f/4 ISO 200

ShastaSony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko MC 100mm 1:2.8 - 1/160s @ f/8 ISO 100

Shasta 2Sony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko 50mm 1:1.4 - 1/6s @ f/4 ISO 100

JiggySony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko MC 35mm 1:2 - 1/125s @ f/2.8 ISO 100

FallsSony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko 50mm 1:1.4 - 8s @ f/8 ISO 50

Randy Sesser

Seasoned coder. Beer connoisseur. Photo enthusiast. This is me.

PDX

Subscribe to randy.sesser

Get the latest posts delivered right to your inbox.

or subscribe via RSS with Feedly!