Why I Left the Full Frame Camp Pt. II

...and eventually came back

A while ago, I wrote that I left full-frame for µ4/3. I started to feel like the bulk of a full-frame DSLR was prohibitive. What's the point of a fancy camera if you're less inclined to take it anywhere. Their output is generally second to none but even a cellphone picture is better than no picture if you're not willing to lug around 3+ lbs (1440g). To some degree that's still true.

So, yeah. I half-dumped µ4/3 and jumped on the full-frame bandwagon again. Not necessarily for image quality concerns. I wanted a larger sensor for equivalency. Before you start in on me about the equivalency issue, hear me out.

I've been an Olympus fan for quite some time. I have a couple SLR bodies, several lenses ranging from 21mm to 100mm (210mm if you count the old Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm 1:3.5) plus two nifty rangefinders (35 RD & 35 SPn). When I had the Canon 6D, focusing with an optical view finder, while not impossible, was less than ideal even after swapping out the stock focus screen the "precision" Eg-s focus screen. The Olympus OM-D, with its electronic view finder, changed that. The ability to use focus aids made focusing a breeze. Olympus lenses aren't the best in absolute performance terms, but some of them do quite well on digital bodies.

AsymetricalOlympus OM-D E-M1 + Olympus OM Zuiko MC 50mm 1:3.5 Macro - 1/100s @ f/8 ISO 200

This was amazing! I could get really sharp results from my old lenses easier than I could with with the Canon. But there was always something that bothered me: I had a good 24mm f/2.8 but on the µ4/3 camera that turned into a 48mm field of view with a not-so-narrow depth of field. I like my wide angle primes. I didn't have that with my old OM mount lenses on the smaller sensor of the µ4/3. Having started my obsession with photography using standard 135 film, crop sensors have always bugged me. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to negate the µ4/3 system; it is a really good system with few flaws. One can make really good images from even smaller sensors; just like one can make really bad images from larger sensors.

While the sensor in the Sony A7 series camera is pretty amazing and performs a little better under certain conditions, it's not the main reason I chose to part ways with the Olympus. No. That was pure internal conflict with my old self telling me, "...but the lens is a 50mm lens! It should have a 50mm field of view!"

So, here I am. Still have an OM-D E-M10 that I use fairly regularly. But I also have a Sony A7II. I like them both for different reasons.

Portland SunsetSony A7II + Olympus OM G.Zuiko 21mm 1:3.5 - 1/1000s @ f/8 ISO 100

Portland ParadeSony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko 24mm 1:2.8 - 1/640s @ f/8 ISO 200

Rhody Garden 1Sony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko 24mm 1:2.8 - 1/125s @ f/8 ISO 100

Little GirlSony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko MC 100mm 1:2.8 - 1/1250s @ f/4 ISO 200

ShastaSony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko MC 100mm 1:2.8 - 1/160s @ f/8 ISO 100

Shasta 2Sony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko 50mm 1:1.4 - 1/6s @ f/4 ISO 100

JiggySony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko MC 35mm 1:2 - 1/125s @ f/2.8 ISO 100

FallsSony A7II + Olympus OM Zuiko 50mm 1:1.4 - 8s @ f/8 ISO 50


Read more posts by this author.


Subscribe to randy.sesser

Get the latest posts delivered right to your inbox.

or subscribe via RSS with Feedly!